Traumatic Brain Injury



Related Posts

Our attorneys have years of experience litigating brain injury claims. Our fluency in and understanding of both the science and the law applicable to brain injury claims enables us to leverage the technical and medical evidence underlying TBI diagnosis, pathophysiology, and outcome in every case.

 We have developed proven, strategic approaches to defending TBIs and their commonly alleged sequelae, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), post-concussion syndrome (PCS), post-traumatic headaches, and post-traumatic vision syndrome. Central to these approaches is a detailed understanding of the underlying biology of TBI, the physics of neuroimaging techniques, and the methodology of neuropsychological testing.

Understand the science, and you will expose your opponent’s legal flaws.

We know concussion.

  • In-depth understanding of pathophysiology of mild TBI (including theories of neurometabolic cascade, neurotoxicity, and axonal shearing/diffuse axonal injury (DAI)).
  • Litigation and evaluation of TBI claims in more than 30 states.
  • Experience with claims by athletes and other individuals with repetitive-concussion history and accompanying expert opinions of injury vulnerability.
  • Experience litigating severe diagnoses, including DAI, chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), and traumatically induced dementias, and forecasts of dire future consequences.
  • The science of brain injury is constantly evolving.

 We know neuropsychology.

  • Extensive experience deposing neuropsychologists in their own language on their assessments of psychological and cognitive functioning, including issues with test battery selection, testing methodology, and data interpretation errors.
  • Successes compelling production by opponents’ experts of raw test data.
  • Internal library of neuropsychological test materials and track record of challenging experts who deviate from accepted methodology.
  • Well-versed on the strengths and weaknesses of specific neuropsychological tests.

We know advanced neuroimaging.

  • Numerous cases where “proof” of injury includes interpretations of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG), and others.
  • Familiar with technical and physics underpinnings of all major neuroimaging techniques. Nuanced understanding of each technique’s administration protocol and technological limitations, including what imaging findings cannot tell you about injury timing and cause. Understanding based on current scientific literature of bounds of accepted use in diagnosis.
  • Depositions of neuroradiologists, nuclear medicine physicians, and neurologists aimed at evidentiary challenges

Related Posts

Study shows symptoms associated with post-concussive syndrome are experienced by a surprising number of people without a history of traumatic brain injury

Headaches, fatigue, concentration problems, and insomnia are just some of the symptoms that can be reported by people who have recently sustai…

Read More

So your brain injury case involves diffusion tensor imaging…now what?

Defense attorneys and claims professionals evaluating traumatic brain injury claims are likely to come across a form of advanced neuroimagin…

Read More

Challenging expert witness opinions on future disease outcomes: what attorneys need to know about the epidemiological concept of relative risk

Most attorneys are likely familiar with the notion that “correlation does not equal causation.” Yet, this critical distinction can…

Read More

Using the Bradford Hill Criteria to analyze injury causation opinions of expert witnesses under Daubert

When litigating bodily injury claims, medical experts proffering causation opinions frequently cite to medical and epidemiological research to…

Read More

Debunking the Plaintiffs’ Reptile Theory: Why Science Says the “Triune Brain” Model is Wrong

By now, defense attorneys are well aware of the “Reptile Theory,” a deposition and trial tactic adopted and advocated by plaintiff…

Read More

Psychological Assessments in Legal Contexts: Are Courts Keeping “Junk Science” Out of the Courtroom?

Testing in the psychological field is shrouded densely in mystery. Psychologists routinely argue that they cannot reveal their underlying te…

Read More

Diffusion Tensor Imaging Traumatic Brain Injury

  Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) has become increasingly common in traumatic brain injury lawsuits as a means to argue the presence of…

Read More

Post-Traumatic Headaches: Concussion Claims 2.0

Headaches are a common complaint in many lawsuits with post-concussion syndrome claims. Experts or treating doctors often diagnose headaches…

Read More

Concussion Claims 2.0

The days of a straightforward concussion defense has ended. Previously, plaintiffs would allege a concussion and claim ongoing "post-concuss…

Read More

Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy: Basic Issues to Consider in Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation

Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE) is a neurodegenerative condition that causes changes in behavior, cognition and mood in individuals w…

Read More